CrawlSpace Guide

Contractor review standards

How We Review Contractors

If the site recommends, lists, or routes homeowners toward contractors, those decisions should be based on transparent criteria, clear disclosures, and a bias toward homeowner protection.

Policy

What we would look for

A good contractor review process should look beyond a star rating.

Clear written scope with line items and exclusions.

Evidence of insurance and appropriate licenses where required.

Before-and-after documentation and moisture readings when relevant.

Careful language around mold, structural, electrical, HVAC, and health claims.

Warranty terms that explain maintenance responsibilities.

Policy

What would raise concern

Some sales patterns deserve extra caution.

One-size-fits-all recommendations without diagnosis.

Covering wet insulation, debris, or visible growth without preparation.

No explanation of drainage before encapsulation when water is active.

Pressure tactics or unclear financing terms.

No written exclusions or verification plan.

Related trust pages

Trust and safety references

These pages work together to explain editorial standards, safety boundaries, privacy expectations, and homeowner protections.

FAQs

Common questions

Short answers about how this site sets expectations and boundaries.

Does this site currently certify contractors?

No. The site can provide contractor questions and review criteria, but certification should not be claimed unless a real vetting program exists and is disclosed.

Can a listed contractor still make mistakes?

Yes. Homeowners should review licenses, insurance, permits, references, scope, and warranty terms before hiring any contractor.

Sources

References and review date

These sources inform the site's privacy, disclosure, safety, mold, and permit boundaries.